RT : from Dec 2017 : #Sandstone "Now embedded in the OCP these are ticking time bombs destructive to downtown and could set us back 25 years when they come back into play which could be any day now… https://t.co/HB9PoAsLlX— NanaimoCommons (@NanaimoCommons) July 16, 2019
Tuesday, July 30, 2019
The elimination of Nanaimo's Urban Containment Boundary : 1 : Full circle
Recent news that the Sandstone property had been purchased by Seacliff Group and that they were submitting Official Community Plan Update and rezoning applications, brings things for me full circle. In 2004 my wife and I and our daughter who was soon to graduate from VIU and go off on her own moved from a North Nanaimo suburb to the downtown "Old City."
At that time the City of Nanaimo was preparing for its 10 Year Official Community Plan Review. Downtown revitalization initiatives were a major reason we moved house and business to the inner city. A Business Improvement Area (BIA) was organized with funding from both a levy on commercial properties and matching funds from the City of Nanaimo taxpayer. It had a board of directors that included two city councillors and met at the council table of the day at City Hall on Wallace Street. More on this later...
There was well an organized and effective group, The Friends of Plan Nanaimo, that participated in the review process and were increasingly opposed to elements of the new plan that differed greatly from the previous OCP (Plan Nanaimo). I wasn't a member of the this group but increasingly we shared many concerns.
An important feature of Plan Nanaimo was the Urban Containment Boundary (UCB), meant to halt sprawling growth across the undeveloped southern area of the city. It was clear to most observers that the UCB was of critical importance to the revitalization of our downtown.
The new plan called for the elimination of the Urban Containment Boundary, even tho by the City's own Land Capacity Analysis there was sufficient residentially-zoned land to meet projected population growth to 2031 and beyond. Then Director of Planning Andrew Tucker was quoted as saying Nanaimo had growth capacity for another 30 - 50,000 people without extending development past the UCB. Why then, eliminate it?
The "review" turned out to be the formalizing by the City of its intent to eliminate the Plan's Urban Containment Boundary and greenlight low density subdivisions and big box retail and a fantasy destination golf course resort across the previously protected greenfields at the southern extremity of the city. I decided then I should perhaps pay a little more attention to civic affairs.
The OCP Review process began with a community consultation conference held on November 18, 2006 at then-Malaspina University-College. Approximately 200 people participated in the all day event that included keynote speakers and small group discussions.
Keynote speakers from Smart Growth BC and Urban Futures, as well as Vancouver Urban Planner Lance Berelowitz spoke on land use and sustainability issues with the overriding message that the Urban Containment Boundary should be maintained and strengthened.
From my letter to the editor, April 2007 : "Massive,
sprawling projects outside the Urban Containment
Boundary will set back downtown revitalization and therefore the
economic and cultural health of the entire city for five, 10 even 15
years... Our regional shopping centre must be the revitalized core of the city. The 'gateway' to the region
described in the South Nanaimo Lands [Sandstone] proposal is more accurately a wall."
Saturday, July 27, 2019
Nanaimo City Council to decide on
downtown tactical "quick wins"
Monday's Governance and Priorities Committee meeting will be making recommendations on downtown “quick win” tactical interventions. I shared some thoughts…
>Subject: Quick Wins
Date: July 27, 2019 at 3:06:32 PM PDT
To: Mayor&Council@nanaimo.ca
I support the idea of taking high visibility actions now downtown, pop-up, tactical quick wins. It’s said it’s important for an organization to both do good work and to be seen to do good work.
Too, other cities are reporting that this approach results in better public opinion feedback and allows for corrections before being made permanent.
Some of the proposed quick wins I suspect will be easy for you to green light: refreshing crosswalk paint lines, and increasing sweeping and power washing frequency, etc.
Here’s the ones I’d prioritize:
Tactical trials of road diet configurations for Front Street with explanatory signage announcing its upcoming redesign. There will be push-back to be weathered! Let’s make a start.
Eliminate the slip lane to create an enlarged Dallas Square. I’d hope this would include signage announcing an upcoming redesign of this important ceremonial plaza. Include a temporary activation element, a piano perhaps, a basketball hoop, moveable tables and chairs...
Repair the Square! http://www.thesidewalkballet.com/2012/11/repair-square.html
Good to see attention to Robson St footpath to Fitzwilliam. Spend a bit of money here. Quality design, include lighting. An important neighbourhood street for infill uses (as are currently underway).
Green light Tideline park, include some tactical element and signage announcing its coming role in that area’s revitalization.
Unsure what re-configuring pedestrian crossings at Commercial, Wallace Albert and Victoria entails but I’d hope it would include elimination of “beg-buttons” (green light automatically includes “walk” signal) and no right turns on red light.
Access to the waterfront walkway concerns me. The drawings of the current plan show the walkway stops abruptly at the edge of the property. This is of course unavoidable but the important connectivity and continuity of the walkway would not be disrupted to the same degree if it carried on from the waterfront on a pathway at the north edge of the property. The access as configured in the drawings is a mistake. A footpath at the north edge would coherently mirror the footpath around the Cameron Island tower and create a superior walking experience.
I’m not sure a scramble intersection configuration at Bastion and Commercial should be a high priority. Crossings are plentiful now here, and my inclination would be to “take our victory” on Commercial and look to surrounding streets to expand on the kinds of things that have made Commercial a far better street than it was a few years ago. Consider though a test scramble at Front and Bastion and/or Front and Chapel.
Happy deliberations!
— Frank
Many of you may have seen this. Urban Studies Prof Michael von Hausen webinar “Making the Next Great Small to Mid-Size Downtowns." Link to his webinar here : https://youtu.be/pnj7OUc5bBo. There are some good ideas for Nanaimo here...
Date: July 27, 2019 at 3:06:32 PM PDT
To: Mayor&Council@nanaimo.ca
I support the idea of taking high visibility actions now downtown, pop-up, tactical quick wins. It’s said it’s important for an organization to both do good work and to be seen to do good work.
— Frank
Many of you may have seen this. Urban Studies Prof Michael von Hausen webinar “Making the Next Great Small to Mid-Size Downtowns." Link to his webinar here : https://youtu.be/pnj7OUc5bBo. There are some good ideas for Nanaimo here...
Friday, July 19, 2019
The Death and Life of Great American Cities, Jane Jacobs, Chapter 22, The Kind of Problem a City Is. "...if understood explains all." pic.twitter.com/mFaZLXJhR7
— TheSidewalkBallet (@1sidewalkballet) October 26, 2017
Wednesday, July 17, 2019
Encore : The Genius of #JaneJacobs, Who Changed the Way We Think About Cities @RobertaGratz @thenation https://t.co/GqxcZJnarc
— TheSidewalkBallet (@1sidewalkballet) July 17, 2019
"Why do smart people enact so many foolish urban policies?"
— TheSidewalkBallet (@1sidewalkballet) September 9, 2012
— Edward Glaeser, The Triumph of the City
Tuesday, July 16, 2019
Richard Florida’s 10 rules for a city’s ‘quality of place’ @Richard_Florida @globeandmail https://t.co/2na8e9KfwH
— NanaimoCommons (@NanaimoCommons) July 16, 2019
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

