#comingsoon #walkability #walkyeg #walkableyeg #walkableedmonton #yeg pic.twitter.com/PLAqdqvnh2
— Walkable Edmonton (@walkableYEG) September 2, 2016
Showing posts with label Urban Planning. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Urban Planning. Show all posts
Wednesday, August 31, 2016
Urban Planner Sandy James on the transformative power of urban walkability
Vancouver City Planner, Sandra James gives examples of how making a community more walkable, can change the social fabric of a neighborhood or a community.
Tuesday, August 30, 2016
From Congress for the New Urbanism —
The morbid and mortal toll of sprawl
A federal report revealed that US traffic deaths have risen 9 percent over the last year and have totaled 19,100 in the first six months of 2016. More than 2.2 million people have been seriously injured in that time. The economic cost is estimated annually at $410 billion, or 2.3 percent of gross domestic product. The human cost is harder to calculate. They are the most frequent reason for fatality of children 5 and up and young adults. Much of the blame has been placed, predictably, on distracted and drunk driving and rising vehicle miles traveled. The “elephant in the living room,” the factor that nobody wants to talk about, is sprawl and the infrastructure of sprawl. The roads built to support sprawl, designed to modern safety standards, are contributors to the majority of US traffic deaths and injuries.
Read more: The morbid and mortal toll of sprawl | CNUFrom @NewUrbanism — Roads built to support sprawl designed to modern standards are contributors to the majority... https://t.co/u9f9M0QWTc— TheSidewalkBallet (@1sidewalkballet) August 29, 2016
Thursday, April 28, 2016
From transportblog.co.nz —
"Downtown development is
the golden goose of urban economics"

When it comes to the debate about housing and development, there’s been plenty of discussion about the physical impacts of decisions we make, for example the height and bulk of buildings. There’s even been to a lesser extent a discussion on the capital costs of development, the costs of building or upgrading roads, pipes and other infrastructure. Some of this is quite evident now with the Transport for Future Growth consultations currently underway.
"Downtown development is the golden goose of urban economics" @TransportBlog #yycplan #yyccc https://t.co/ctLRDXtP5A pic.twitter.com/8quQrBwMYt— Dale Calkins (@DaleCalkins) April 25, 2016
Sunday, December 6, 2015
From Business in Vancouver —
Traditional infrastructure funding
throws money down the sewer
PETER LADNER Amid all the excitement about the Christmas bounty of infrastructure spending coming at us from our deficit-happy new federal government, it’s a good time to ask how we got ourselves into this infrastructure hole.
Charles Marohn, the Republican civil engineer behind the U.S. Strong Towns movement, has an answer. He likens traditional suburban development to a Ponzi scheme. Tax revenues from low-density development don’t come near paying for maintenance and depreciation on costly infrastructure. He estimates suburban property taxes bring in only $0.04 to $0.65 for every dollar of liability. So cities embrace new developments to keep their cash flowing, or they go into debt, or both. At every stage, they pile on future liabilities.
“When people say we’re living beyond our means, they’re usually talking about a 40-inch TV instead of a 20-inch TV,” Marohn told Time magazine. “This is like pennies compared to the dollars we’ve spent on the way we’ve arranged ourselves across the landscape.” Municipal servicing costs in low-density sprawl can be 2.5 times those in compact, high-density neighbourhoods. Read more: Traditional infrastructure funding throws money down the sewer | Economy | Business in Vancouver
LIVING/WORKING - Traditional infrastructure spending throws money down the sewer https://t.co/mb6V2wzFbn pic.twitter.com/OeDgHPiruV
— BusinessInVancouver (@bizinvancouver) December 6, 2015
Tuesday, October 27, 2015
We approach the 1st anniversary of #Nanaimo City Council, a Council more broadly representative of our community…

Frank Murphy
#Nanaimo: a crisis is a terrible thing to waste.
https://t.co/nCw0VREsm0
— NanaimoCommons (@NanaimoCommons) October 28, 2015
Thursday, July 30, 2015
From CityLab —
Getting smaller cities walking

Thursday, June 18, 2015
From Better! Cities and Towns —
Form-based codes: What's the deal?
Form-based codes: What's the deal? The community gets walkable neighborhoods with affordable housing—developers get a streamlined approval process.
Posted by Better! Cities & Towns on Wednesday, June 17, 2015
Tuesday, June 9, 2015
New West Mayor Cote uses SFU urban studies degree to solve real-world problems
Sunday, May 31, 2015
Nanaimo Downtown Urban Plan and
Design Guidelines: Parks and open spaces
#Nanaimo Downtown Urban Plan and Design Guidelines: Parks and open spaces. https://t.co/aMJTzNmzgw @andrewtrevjones @katemac22 @Rearrang3d
— NanaimoCommons (@NanaimoCommons) May 31, 2015 Friday, March 20, 2015
From @metroEdmonton —
Edmonton proposes to let residents play urban planner with new CITYlab project
![]() |
| Senior Planner Jeff Chase |
Tuesday, March 10, 2015
Friday, March 6, 2015
From The Guardian —
Are we seeing the erosion of
public space and access in our cities?

Monday, March 2, 2015
Huntsville Alabama $70m downtown mixed use development calls for "road diet"

Thursday, February 19, 2015
Saturday, February 7, 2015
60% of families would choose a smaller home in #walkable, transit-friendly neighbourhood
60% of families would choose a smaller home if it was in #walkable, transit-friendly neighbourhood pic.twitter.com/M4eW3HvFlv v/@BrentToderian
— Canadian Urbanism (@CanUrbanism) January 18, 2015
Sunday, February 1, 2015
@guardiancities 'mayors for a day'
demand more #publicspaces in their cities

Friday, January 2, 2015
From CityLab — The Tragic Comedy of
Small Business Permitting
It’s as if as soon as there is activity in an urban setting, local government springs into action to regulate it. Cities and towns are well-known for imposing all kinds of of rules and codes, a great maze to be navigated both in the creation of buildings and their occupation and operation. On a proportional basis, the tight control exceeds anything decreed at the state or federal level. So it was with great interest to learn of an initiative in one of the regulatory regime’s most guilty parties, San Francisco, to loosen up a little bit. And the rebellion, to its great credit, began in the Planning Department. More: CityLab — The Tragic Comedy of Small Business Permitting
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
