Showing posts with label Wellcox Railyards. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Wellcox Railyards. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 15, 2017

The case for moving ahead now on
our South Downtown Waterfront Lands

The case for making a start now on the development of our downtown waterfront lands. The recent referendum has shown broad public support for the careful, sensitive development of this site, and we should take advantage of that goodwill to put things in motion. You could say that we have already made a start with the South Downtown Waterfront Initiative’s Vision and Guiding Principles.  
Any proposal, this one included, should recognize and honour the complexities and realities of the site. They are:
1. Adherence to the Downtown Waterfront Initiative’s Vision and Guiding Principles.
2. The Treaty and land claims rights of the Snuneymuxw First Nation.
3. The access rights of Seaspan and the Island Corridor Foundation.
4. The role the private sector, the market, will have to play in its future.
However each and all of these are eventually satisfied the site will require infrastructure. We should act now to begin work on this infrastructure. It needn’t (shouldn’t) wait for every use and design “i" to be dotted.  
Creation of a magnificent public plaza on the waterfront should proceed immediately. A serviced short block urban street grid should be built and building lots subdivided. These would allow for investors large and small, local and national or off-shore to bring fresh ideas and capital to the site all within the guidelines established by the SDWI. City owned serviced lots could be set aside for favourable long term leases to non-profits and co-ops for non-market and social housing. Others set aside to be ceded to the Snuneymuxw as a portion, along with the Federal Government, of Treaty and land claims settlements.
There is huge value latent in the site which belongs to people of Nanaimo. Right now it’s a large underused site the value of which is mostly in its potential. We should create that value by doing what only the City can do: develop its infrastructure. Revenues would be generated as portions were carefully and strategically sold. This would go a long way in paying for the improvements. It's also essential the foot ferry, if it ever comes to be, docks on these waterfront lands in close proximity to other uses, not on the remote Port Authority's cruise ship pier. 
Take a look at the work done by a landscape architecture from like  PWL Partnership Landscape Architects in Vancouver. PWL principal Derek Lee has worked here as a consultant to Parks and Rec. (Picture: New West Pier Park)

Tuesday, May 12, 2015

City of Nanaimo MOU with Seaspan,
Island Corridor Foundation


RT @cityofnanaimo City, Seaspan and Southern Rail enter into MOU http://cnan.ca/1Qr8Xf8
Posted by Nanaimo Commons on Thursday, May 7, 2015


Memorandum of Understanding pdf here.

Monday, March 2, 2015

#‎Nanaimo‬ continues to "pave" the way for
South Dtown waterfront lands redevelopment @NanaimoBulletin

Revitalization efforts continue on waterfront site - Nanaimo News Bulletin

Tuesday, February 17, 2015

‪ Wellcox Lands enviro assessment:
meets provincial standards, can be
industrially or commercially developed


Thursday, October 16, 2014

@Helijet to launch flights between ‪#‎Nanaimo‬, Vancouver


Thursday, October 2, 2014

Seaspan Marine railway barge connecting Nanaimo to all of NA Class 1 Railways @ICF_IslandRail


Tuesday, August 19, 2014

Sneak peak at some @IslandFerriesca concept drawings...


Thursday, June 19, 2014

#Nanaimo and @IslandFerriesca have inked a long term lease for a foot passenger ferry to Vancouver.


Wednesday, June 4, 2014

Island Corridor Foundation / VIA Rail agreement "for all intents and purposes concluded"


Monday, May 12, 2014

Wellcox site preparation pegged at $1 million @tamaracunning


Wednesday, April 2, 2014

Island Corridor Foundation Announces Tentative Agreement that Promises the Return of Passenger Rail to Vancouver Island

Island Corridor Foundation announced this morning at a press conference at the Train Station on Selby Street in Nanaimo that there is a tentative agreement between the ICF, Southern Rail and Via that promises the return of passenger rail to Vancouver Island. Needs ratification, if approved it will free up $20 million in fed, provincial and regional district funds to begin rail and bridge repair. That work is expected to take 9 months. There is the possibility of passenger service into the city-owned Wellcox property on the waterfront.

Saturday, March 29, 2014

From The Atlantic Cities
How New York Is Building an Entire Neighborhood on Top of a Rail Yard

The neighborhood will be known as Hudson Yards, and construction has officially begun on the first platforms — over the eastern part of the rail yard. That platform will ultimately hold two office towers, two residential towers (one of which will have a hotel), a million square feet of retail, and about five acres of open public space. And it will all come together as 30 Long Island Railroad tracks remain in operation to serve commuters through Penn Station. Read more: How New York Is Building an Entire Neighborhood on Top of a Rail Yard - Eric Jaffe - The Atlantic Cities

Wednesday, March 5, 2014

From The Sidewalk Ballet, Jan. 2013 —
City of Nanaimo to Purchase 26.7 Acre Downtown Waterfront Rail Yards

Pending an environmental review, the City of Nanaimo has announced an agreement with Canadian Pacific to purchase its rail yards. The area was excluded from the 2008 Downtown Urban Design Plan and Guidelines and piecemeal redevelopment of Port Place immediately to the north has proceeded without a master plan for this area.
Redevelopment of these brownfields holds great potential of course but considering a track record here of opportunities lost over the last 10 years I fear the worst. Council will be asked to approve a budget for a "master plan [which] will include not just the land we’re buying but all of the CP lands and the waterfront lands,” says the City's GM Development Ted Swabey. The area should be the subject of a Design Competition geared to attracting top Planning and Architectural talent and badly needed fresh ideas.
There is an agreement in place with the Regional District to collaborate with them on a transit hub. The Snuneymuxw First Nation's reserve lands are to the immediate south and they hold both treaty rights and land purchase options which will directly effect the redevelopment of the site. The Island Corridor Foundation who own the rail line and stations on south and central Vancouver Island are among others who hold land rights and rights of way.
Scariest prospect of all a popular idea for a 5,000 seat multiplex. There simply does not seem to be either the Planning talent or the political will here to, if this goes ahead, create anything other than a piece of brutal architecture floating in acres of surface parking doing  damage to existing downtown neighbourhoods. Much lip service has been offered here about making "place not space" with appropriated urbanspeak aside, nothing meaningful to show for it.
Here's City Councillor Fred Pattje re the Port Place plans proceeding without a master plan for the southern waterfront:
“This is not proper urban planning in my view,” he said. “The Nanaimo Port Authority wants to do something significant with the assembly wharf and the Snuneymuxw have an interest in the Wilcox property. This whole area is Nanaimo’s last urban frontier and there’s no connection in the planning for any of it, so eventually we’ll end up with something really unpleasant."

Thursday, February 27, 2014

Guest Post: Dan Appell

Unless I am overlooking something that is in plain sight, I'm seeing four actions that, if completed now, would allow planning for the development of the Wellcox properties to proceed immediately.
• The "Bowtie" property between the Gabriola Ferry terminal and the Wellcox properties has to be acquired by either the city or the province, from the Port Authority. This will likely involve a land swap. If the province acquires it, then I will assume it is to expand the operations of the ferry terminal. If the city acquires it will allow for a more extensive development of the Wellcox properties. Either way, the city and the province can work together to create a more interesting, transparent and dynamic interface between the terminal and the Wellcox development.
Truck traffic can be moved off Front Street, the intersection of Front St. and Esplanade can be reduced considerably because turning radiuses at this corner are no longer needed. All of Front Street can be reduced in width by at least one driving lane.  Also tree planting and sidewalk widening and bicycle lane construction could take place on this street. Instead of a road to nowhere which it is now. Front Street could be developed as a proper street and a place to be.
• The boundary of the train right-of-way must be clarified. This will allow the development of a retaining wall on that boundary. The wall would allow the area between Esplanade, Front Street and the train right-of-way to be more or less levelled. On top of the wall would be a walkway that leads from Esplanade down to the Gabriola Ferry Terminal via a very gentle slope.
• A permanent foot passenger ferry to Vancouver will have to be established with a dock and terminal. The infrastructure that would be required would be a new bridge where the tussle bridge is now and water and sewer introduced to the site at the about the same time. Also, a new pedestrian bridge over the train tracks could link the Gadd property to the Wellcox development and the rest of downtown.
These four things, in my view,  create the conditions which allow for optimal development of the Wellcox property without a lot of disruption to the industry that is located in the neighbouring properties.
Some might argue that a location for a bus exchange must be established as well, but I am not convinced there is a need for a bus exchange, because the more efficient our bus system is, the less we need a bus exchange. If a bus exchange is deemed necessary for political reasons, then perhaps it could be located next to the foot passenger ferry terminal with bus access off Esplanade over the new bridge.
These four actions, except for the redesign of Front Street, wouldn't involve any construction.
Acquire the "Bowtie," plan for the redesign of Front Street, establish the train right-of-way boundary, and establish the permanent location of the foot passenger ferry terminal. These could proceed as quickly as possible before any master-planning for the development of the site is completed. Indeed, a proper plan for the area would require these four actions anyway, so there is no reason why we can't proceed as soon as right now.

Dan Appell is an artist and Nob Hill resident, active with the Neighbours of Nob Hill Society. He describes his education as "an extensive progression from art, to architecture to urban design".

Friday, February 21, 2014

From The Sidewalk Ballet — Nanaimo's South Downtown Waterfront Initiative

From: frankmurphy@thesidewalkballet.com
Subject: S Downtown Waterfront Initiative Survey
Date: 9 October, 2013 1:20:50 PM PDT
To: sdwaterfront@cityspaces.ca


Comment submitted earlier to your online survey —

Some preliminary thoughts — Early effort to build a public identity for the initiative — the new website, the boots on the ground fair that invited people to discuss the site while touring it, encouraging citizens to attend the (brutally early) committee meetings — is positive and welcome. I'd like to see this phase followed by one where the committee itself and its consultant move to a proactive role in educating people that to be truly successful in realizing the potential of this extraordinary site, there will need to be some discomfort inducing change in the way we have imagined and designed our city. More on this later but for now: I'm referring to dynamics such as Nanaimo's low population density and accompanying car dependency. A number of external factors impact the potential of the site and it's important (though generally in Nanaimo considered impolite) to air them in the earliest days of this process. For instance I'll draw attention to First Capital's Port Place blank wall and expanse of surface parking which has done probably irreparable harm to the Front Street streetscape and made a key piece of the site's interconnectedness puzzle a huge challenge. Also more later on connectivity. 



I'm still trying to get my mind around some of the complexities here. The combination of primary property ownership and rights of access in covenants and existing leaseholders are confusing me. Fascinating and full of potential but confusing. (See map).

While the City-mandated study area is quite rightly the entire waterfront area between the Snuneymuxw lands and the Gabriola Ferry (some say a at-least-broad-brush-stroke study should have been done as part of the 2008 Downtown Urban Design Plan and Guidelines), it's the City, Port and Provincial Crown lands north of the trestle bridge that hold short and medium term potential for redevelopment. Do I have that about right? And the redevelopment of this portion will require a shared vision with the Island Corridor Foundation and the Port Authority and will impact the existing leaseholders. Seaspan's right of access through the site holds the key to moving to the next step if I'm not mistaken. And in case this was all starting to look pretty simple, there is a memorandum of agreement between the City and the Regional District to locate a "transit hub" here. What exactly is meant by a "transit hub" in a sprawling City with a commercial highway running through its downtown scares the bejesus out of me. I see examples elsewhere of transit interconnections by design creating prosperous successful human scale urban "place". Time for an indication that we have some idea of how to do that here.

My initial focus will be the Esplanade and north waterfront connections. Key I think is identifying the characteristics and purpose of "precinct" here. Central is public space. Waterfront access is a primary opportunity of course but there's the chance to do something so much better than just a sea wall. Connected public squares and plazas connecting both at and to the waterfront and through the site. Connected and integrated. This is in general not something Nanaimo has done well. In terms of primary use, Nanaimo has long needed a downtown satellite campus of Vancouver Island University. As Gordon Price has pointed out one of the our biggest urban planning mistakes has been the remote isolated locations of university campuses.

http://www.thesidewalkballet.com/2013/02/from-price-tags-biggest-public-sector.html

A public sector education and training cluster here (ideally including the SFN) integrated with a convenient modern transit system (passenger ferry, light rail, inter city bus all included) holds much promise seems to me.

Meanwhile I'm re-reading Ken Greenberg's Walking Home about his experiences over his career working on many sites not unlike this one and close with this thought —

Who will break it to Nanaimoites that for any potential to be realized here there will be virtually no surface parking?

Frank Murphy
Selby St Nanaimo
www.thesidewalkballet.com
The Sidewalk Ballet: Nanaimo's South Downtown Waterfront Initiative

Tuesday, February 18, 2014

Background: From The Sidewalk Ballet
City of Nanaimo to Purchase 26.7 Acre Downtown Waterfront Rail Yards

Pending an environmental review, the City of Nanaimo have announced an agreement with Canadian Pacific to purchase its rail yards. The area was excluded from the 2008 Downtown Urban Design Plan and Guidelines and piecemeal redevelopment of Port Place immediately to the north has proceeded without a master plan for this area. Read more: The Sidewalk Ballet: City of Nanaimo to Purchase 26.7 Acre Downtown Waterfront Rail Yards