Monday, July 6, 2020
Sunday, July 5, 2020
Population densities, low incomes, dwellings built 1960 or before by Census Tract
Occupied private dwellings by period of construction - 25% sample data 39,165
— NanaimoCommons (@NanaimoCommons) July 5, 2020
1960 or before 5,360 pic.twitter.com/zkbKsgfxip
Friday, July 3, 2020
Nanaimo 2016 Census Tracts. Population densities. Low income. (LICO-AT) cc @wilderland_girl pic.twitter.com/0CxVIrkuUV
— NanaimoCommons (@NanaimoCommons) July 3, 2020
Tuesday, June 30, 2020
Sunday, June 28, 2020
Nanaimo : Numbers of children
living in poverty. 2016 Census
Low-income status in 2015 for the population in private households to whom low-income concepts are applicable - 100% data. 0 - 17 years. Click to enlarge.
Statistics Canada. 2017. Nanaimo, CY [Census subdivision], British Columbia and Nanaimo, RD [Census division], British Columbia (table). Census Profile. 2016 Census. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 98-316-X2016001. Ottawa. Released November 29, 2017.
Low-income cut-offs, after tax (LICO-AT) - The Low-income cut-offs, after tax refers to an income threshold, defined using 1992 expenditure data (adjusted to current dollars using the all-items Consumer Price Index (CPI)), below which economic families or persons not in economic families would likely have devoted a larger share of their after-tax income than average to the necessities of food, shelter and clothing. More specifically, the thresholds represented income levels at which these families or persons were expected to spend 20 percentage points or more of their after-tax income than average on food, shelter and clothing.
Statistics Canada. 2017. Nanaimo, CY [Census subdivision], British Columbia and Nanaimo, RD [Census division], British Columbia (table). Census Profile. 2016 Census. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 98-316-X2016001. Ottawa. Released November 29, 2017.
Low-income cut-offs, after tax (LICO-AT) - The Low-income cut-offs, after tax refers to an income threshold, defined using 1992 expenditure data (adjusted to current dollars using the all-items Consumer Price Index (CPI)), below which economic families or persons not in economic families would likely have devoted a larger share of their after-tax income than average to the necessities of food, shelter and clothing. More specifically, the thresholds represented income levels at which these families or persons were expected to spend 20 percentage points or more of their after-tax income than average on food, shelter and clothing.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

