Monday, July 26, 2021
Google Earth Timelapse
City of Nanaimo 1984 - 2020
Thursday, July 22, 2021
"Perhaps walking is best imagined as an ‘indicator species’ to use an ecologist’s term. An indicator species signifies the health of an ecosystem; its endangerment or diminishment can be an early warning sign of systemic trouble."
— NanaimoCommons (@NanaimoCommons) July 22, 2021
—Rebecca Solnit, Wanderlust: A History of Walking https://t.co/WiwtTb5q9L
Sunday, July 18, 2021
They’d do well, too, to question why a proactive chief planner working with the neighbourhood, beyond the disproportionately represented SFH owners, was not in place to help guide them to better outcome.
— NanaimoCommons (@NanaimoCommons) July 18, 2021
Scorched earth : 1 : a failure of leadership https://t.co/0VsfVBtYEI pic.twitter.com/6nNsddgOuK
Saturday, July 17, 2021
Like it or not, climate activists are
urbanism advocates now
Photo by Henry & Co. on Unsplash |
#WalkableCity: How Downtown Can Save [Your City] One Step at a Time. A General Theory of Walkability. @JeffSpeckFAIC |
All of which is to say that it’s in land use — the tough decisions around and the urban design of land use — that municipal governments are uniquely positioned to make meaningful contributions to the reduction of harmful GHG emissions.
The climate activists currently on our city council may never be closer to the opportunity and the power to take historic and courageous actions.
Only municipal government can make the transformative changes in local transportation and neighbourhood design and intensification that create environmentally and economically sustainable 15 minute neighbourhoods.
Surely this clarifies the task for the climate activists now sitting at the decision making tables.
So if we follow this line of thought—40% of GHG emissions are from transportation and building heating; and that jurisdiction + authority over these rests almost exclusively with municipal governments—what are the bold and courageous actions climate activists on council can take?We can’t beat the climate crisis without rethinking land use https://t.co/Pr76BWFVEw via @BrookingsInst
— NanaimoCommons (@NanaimoCommons) July 16, 2021
Well, thanks for asking! Creating less car-dependent and more compact neighbourhoods is a function, in part, of planning and urban design. Council climate activists need an ally in this area and should insist the city manager hire an experienced 21C chief planner, a proven change-maker.
This new chief planner should be empowered to revitalize the department and decentralize it into neighbourhood planning centres. From here genuine street-level conversations can be held with a broad inclusive range of Nanaimo citizens.
A city plan process has to be a conversation in a meaningful way. Conversations are dangerous, they might lead in directions that the risk-and-innovation-averse status quo powers at the heart of our City Hall fear. That’s precisely why it’s important to have them."I prioritize street-level engagement. I come to the people. My office is the neighbourhood, my work is done in constituents' localized spaces: homes churches businesses bus stops." @c1typlann3r @EmbeddedPlann @APA_Planning
— NanaimoCommons (@NanaimoCommons) February 27, 2021
We Cannot Plan From Our Desks https://t.co/EkRFdzjzJx
The current city plan review (Reimagine Nanaimo) is top-down and based on the one-way communication of an online survey (city planning isn’t market research).
This is the opposite of the public conversation we need to be having and it now proceeds behind closed doors led by an anonymous in-house “team.”
This approach has been thoroughly discredited by just about every other city in the country and the plug should be pulled on this immediately and with urgency until a new director of planning and urban design is in place.
So… that’s the challenge and the opportunity. Are our climate activists up to the fight? That’s the question.